From the Acadia Center: Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Programs Again Top National Bests for Savings

By Kiernan Dunlop, Acadia Center

Massachusetts' energy efficiency Program Administrators recently announced remarkable preliminary program results for 2015. In 2015, the programs produced an estimated $3.42 billion in benefits for Massachusetts, delivering $4.70 in benefits for every dollar that the utilities invested in the program and achieving an unprecedented savings level of 3.01% of annual electric sales. This savings level exceeds not only the 2015 goal of 2.60% of annual electric sales, but also the nation-leading ambitious 2016-2018 goals, set at 2.94% of annual electric sales. 

2015 is the last year of the 2013-2015 Three Year Efficiency Plan, which itself set top-in-the nation targets for energy efficiency savings. Over the course of the last three years, the Massachusetts efficiency programs have produced $7.79 billion in benefits for customers in Massachusetts, electric savings equivalent to powering 546,239 homes for a year, gas savings equivalent to heating 95,763 homes for a year, and greenhouse gas reductions equivalent to taking 434,900 cars off the road. And they did all this coming in under budget (spending only 98% of the total DPU-approved budget over the three year period).

“Massachusetts is setting an example for the rest of the nation not only by consistently establishing the highest energy efficiency goals in the nation, but by exceeding them. The energy efficiency programs responsible for reaching these goals show the country that it is possible to save consumers money and have a clean and secure energy future,” said Daniel L. Sosland, Acadia Center President. 

Building on the widespread growth of the residential efficiency programs in 2014, spurred by increasing adoption of affordable LED lights, home insulation and installation of highly efficient heating equipment, 2015 also delivered significant savings in the commercial and industrial sector – including meeting the statewide goals for annual savings in electricity in this sector for the first time since the efficiency programs began in their current form. This success is attributable in part to high levels of adoption of combined heat and power operations at commercial and industrial facilities, which are some of the most cost-effective energy savings available in Massachusetts. 

The programs also bring major benefits to the Commonwealth, beyond the direct savings for those who implement these services in their homes and businesses. This year's efficiency investments yielded: 

  • Electric demand savings equivalent to a 222 MW power plant
  • 1,473 GWh of annual electric savings (enough to power 187,872 homes for a year)
  • 25.9 million therms of annual gas savings (enough to heat over 43,100 homes for a year)
  • 446,218 MMBtu of oil saved in 2015
  • Annual GHG reductions of 838,000 short tons, which is equivalent to removing over 160,085 cars from the road. 

USGBC MA supports the work of the Acadia Center and looks forward to working with other advocacy organizations, energy efficiency program administrators and other stakeholders to make sure that the Commonwealth continues to set and achieve ambitious goals for energy efficiency. 

“This level of success in 2015 sets Massachusetts up well to achieve the ambitious goals of the 2016-2018 three year plan,” said Amy Boyd, Acadia Center Senior Attorney who serves on the EEAC, “Massachusetts has a significant opportunity to build on the progress we've seen to-date and bring even more benefits for homes and businesses.”

Promoting Walkability Training at the Mel King Institute

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow

Join LISC for a LEED approved continuing education credit training sponsored by the Mel King Institute for Community Building!

The Mel King Institute for Community Building fosters vibrant and thriving Massachusetts communities by advancing the skills, knowledge and leadership ability of professional practitioners and volunteer leaders in the community development field. Mel King trainings focus on four topic areas: Community Organizing and Planning, Economic Development, Nonprofit Governance, and Real Estate Development. 

The upcoming Walkability training will cover what it means for a community to be “walkable” and how to create neighborhoods that are safe, active, accessible, and vibrant. This training, which is geared toward architects, planners, Community Development Corporation staff, public health advocates, municipalities, and other community groups will explain the basics of how to design development projects and advocate for neighborhoods that promote walking and active living. This training will include a walking component in the neighborhood where we will explore issues of walkability first hand!

WalkBoston Executive Director Wendy Landman and Project Manager Adi Nochur will lead this training, and guest speakers will include Mike Chavez, Enterprise Rose Fellow at the Fairmount Collaborative; David Queeley, Eco-Innovation Fellow at Codman Square Neighborhood Development Corporation; and Marah Holland, Health Equity and Community Wellness Coordinator at Madison Park Development Corporation. 

The event will take place on April 5th from 9:30am-12:30pm (9:00am refreshments) at Codman Square Health Center’s Black Box Theater, 637 Washington Street, Dorchester, MA 02134.

To register, go to https://melkinginstitute.org/events/promoting-walkability-creating-safe-and-active-neighborhoods ($25 registration fee).

To learn more about the LEED CE credits, go to http://www.usgbc.org/education/sessions/promoting-walkability-creating-safe-and-active-neighborhoods-10096108

We hope to see you there!

Sustainability, Emerging Economies & the Developing World

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow

The following is an excerpt taken from Chapter 3, “Building Green,” of Green Think: How Profit Can Save the Worldwritten by USGBC's co-founder and CEO, Rick Fedrizzi:

Not long ago, I traveled to Mumbai, India, to visit the city’s first LEED Platinum building. It’s a beautiful structure that resembles many LEED buildings around the world, including those highlighted in this chapter. You can see the use of glass to let in natural light…the LED fixtures on each of those floors… all the sustainable features that, by now, we’ve come to expect from green buildings.


And yet as soon as you step outside, it’s a very different story. As far as the eye can see, in every direction, there are slums. I saw people who have only a piece of cardboard—or if they’re lucky, a sheet of corrugated metal—protecting them from the elements. The smell of human waste and trash hit me in waves alongside the oppressive heat. I remember, standing outside this space-age tower juxtaposed with the Stone Age shantytown surrounding it, feeling as though I had landed on another planet.

The juxtaposition is tragically common. From the favelas of São Paolo to disadvantaged communities in the Bronx, poverty and desolation are often found not very far from gleaming new LEED buildings. On the way back to my hotel in Mumbai, I kept thinking about these stark contrasts, and honestly, it made me really uncomfortable. While LEED addresses the problem of unsustainable buildings, buildings only partially address the problem of our unsustainable and unjust global society.

Don’t get me wrong. LEED is fantastic—for profits, for the planet, and for people all around the world. And while the first two are important, for me sustainability has always been about people. Green buildings allow us to live better, to work better, to heal and learn and play better. But in a world in which environmental degradation is severely impacting—and in some cases, ending—people’s lives, you have to stop and ask: What more can we do to make the world better, safer, healthier, fairer, happier, and yes, more sustainable?

To me, the answer is obvious. We have to take the principles of LEED and extend them far beyond the four walls of a building, out to the four corners of the world itself. WE must take the lessons of LEED and use them—urgently—to improve not just our built environment, but also our social institutions, our political institutions, and the very fabric of our society at large.

This chapter is filled with firsts. The first LEED Platinum school. The First LEED Platinum hospital. The first LEED Gold ballpark with a retractable roof. My money—and a lot of other people’s—is betting on the fact that soon we won’t be talking about the first LEED Platinum building in this industry or that town. We’ll be talking about the first LEED certified city.

If you think that’s far-fetched, consider the pace of change and development in emerging economies around the world. In China, whole new cities are springing up practically overnight. According to McKinsey & Company, “70 to 80 percent of the India of 2030 is yet to be built.” But it will be. And if the gorgeous building I toured in Mumbai is any indication, it will be sustainable. Just think of all the hospitals and homes, the stadiums and schools that can improve the lives of billions of people living in the developing world.


This is not a fantasy. The environmental benefits of green-think are undeniable. The human benefits cannot be understated. And the profit motive—the ability to save and even make money while saving the environment and saving lives—continues to drive companies and communities toward higher standards of efficiency and sustainability. Experts and economists, corporate and civil society leaders all around the world are getting wise to the incredible power of sustainability—and rising to the challenge of doing for our world what LEED is doing for buildings.

From where I’m standing, it is no longer a question of if we will see a sustainable world. The green building movement has proved that we have the ability and the global demand to drive this change. The only variable is when. When will greenthink become second nature? When will some people get their hands out of the unsustainable, unprofitable sands/ To be fair, I don’t know how soon we’ll see a LEED-certified city—though it’s likely sooner than you think—but I do know that if we keep building on this work, and keep building green, we will continue to see extraordinary growth in LEED and unprecedented social and environmental benefits as a result.

Ultimately, to be truly sustainable, we have to pull in economics and politics and food sourcing and transportation and manufacturing and every other sector and discipline there is, until we have a fully three-dimensional view of sustainability. The stories of the green buildings in this chapter are among my very favorite. But even so, they’re merely footnotes in a larger, epic sustainability story that’s being written all around us. 

If you're interested in reading more, you can find the book here on Amazon for $12.99— as you will find out if you read the book, each book is made only after it is ordered to reduce waste and inefficiency!


Living Building Challenge in Australia

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow


Attention USGBCMA community!  We have a special challenge for all our members from the Living Future Institute of Australia (LFIA).  The LFIA has launched a design competition for a retail centre in Melbourne Australia to meet the Living Building Challenge (more here).

The LFIA is encouraging entries from all around the world. Living Building Challenges do a great job at drawing in the progressive and clever people that enjoy the opportunity to solve problems and the challenge organizers are hoping to spread their contest to every corner of the world, including Massachusetts!

The Prompt
The Brickworks Living Building Challenge is an international design competition for a new retail centre in a former brickworks site in Melbourne, Australia. We invite designers, professionals, environmental experts, and students to submit ideas to redefine what a culturally rich, socially just, and ecologically restorative retail centre could be. You are invited to step up, and participate.

Read more about the challenge online or check out the flier!

Sponsor Spotlight: Vidaris

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow


Vidaris, a bronze-level sponsor of ours, is a provider of niche consulting services within the architecture, engineering and construction industries focusing on high-performance buildings and specialty structures. Through an integrated, holistic approach, they provide solutions for building envelope, energy efficiency and sustainability projects. The company was created by combining the legacy firms of Israel Berger and Associates, LLC (IBA) and Viridian Energy & Environmental, LLC.

In 2011, IBA and Viridian Energy & Environmental merged their specialized service offerings to form Vidaris. As building envelope designs and mechanical systems were becoming more complex, the two companies recognized that it was an opportunity, more so a necessity, for them to be able to provide a holistic approach to these closely related disciplines for their clients.   Deep technical knowledge, a long proven track record, reputation, and a sophisticated analytical approach would allow Vidaris to provide a level of service second to none.


One monumental example of Vidaris's high caliber work is the One World Trade Center in New York, completed in 2014.  Standing 1776 feet tall, the iconic tower’s unique envelope incorporates curtain wall, glass panel wall, cablenet wall. As building envelope consultants, Vidaris assisted Skidmore, Owings and Merrill in drawing review and mock-ups for exterior wall performance. Vidaris was also instrumental in the development and selection of building exterior materials including a high performance thermally advanced curtain wall system, incorporating energy efficient low-e glass.

Vidaris evaluated the thermal modeling simulations to select optimized building envelope components as they relate to energy efficiency and code compliance. Vidaris witnessed the curtain wall fabrication and monitored the installation. As sustainability consultants, Vidaris developed the overall green/LEED thrust. This direction was subsequently used for the three other Silverstein towers of the World Trade Center complex. Vidaris has also been analyzing the energy use for the mega-project.

To see more abbout Vidaris, visit their website or see more of their projects

The State of Our Schools– From the Center for Green Schools

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow


The Center for Green Schools just released a 30-page long assessment of America's K-12 Facilities. This comprehensive federal review of our nation's school infrastructure bleakly concludes that schools are severely underfunded (to the tune of $46 billion a year). The construction, maintenance, and operations of our nation's schools are essential, as is the health and future success of students who occupy them.

The report includes 5 critical chapters:  a section explaining why school facilities matter so much, a section proposing “a generation of facilities change,” a brief chronology of public education facilities spending from 1994 to 2013, a chapter addressing the thresholds and criteria for obtaining satisfactory educational facility standards, and a concluding outline of strategies to meet modern standards and a call to action. Here are some brief excerpts from the report and the concluding call to action:

School Facilities Affect Health and Performance


The importance of facilities to health and performance is well established. In a literature review examining ventilation rates and respiratory illness, for example, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley Labs noted an increase of 50 percent to 370 percent in the incidence of respiratory illness in spaces with low ventilation rates, as are commonly found in schools, compared to spaces meeting industry-accepted standards. Breathing fresh air is not only critical for keeping students healthy but also for keeping them alert. Several studies have linked recirculating air and low ventilation rates in classrooms with lower average daily attendance and slower speed in completing tasks. Studies also have found that poor facilities are strongly associated with student truancy and higher rates of suspensions.

School Facilities Impact the Environment

The massive scale of school district infrastructure has a major impact on overall municipal infrastructure. One green roof installed on an existing school in New York City, for example, resulted in a reduction in storm water runoff of 450,000 gallons a year, both protecting the city’s water treatment systems and promoting wildlife habitats.11 Districts also have removed hardscape — like asphalt — and used native plants in landscaping, which helps mitigate a community’s vulnerabilities from drought and flooding. Locating schools near the homes of students can enhance a community’s resilience by providing ready shelter and safety in the event of natural disasters. And it can simultaneously reduce vehicle miles traveled by parents and buses, contributing to healthier air and reduced fuel consumption. 

A Call to Action

Federal, state, and local stakeholders — from senators to state legislators to superintendents, community leaders to impact investors — must collaborate to create, pilot, and scale new solutions and document successful strategies. Community and investment partners must come to the table. Five states already have created separate agencies dedicated to school facilities. Some are focused primarily on state allocation of capital funds. Others are engaged in planning and project management and construction itself. One — New Mexico Public School Authority — is involved in the continuum of facilities from M&O to design and construction. However, the current reality is that most districts in most states must deliver 21st century school facilities on their own. Thought leaders from education, government, industry, and communities are invited to use and improve on the data and standards framework presented in this report to brainstorm, share, and pilot creative new solutions to these common facilities challenges. Successful strategies that emerge from these pilots must be documented, refined, and adapted for scale. The result: school facilities that meet the needs of today’s students, in every community, and for generations to come.

To read the full report, click here

National: New Report Shows Systemic Inequity in American School Infrastructure Investment

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow



USGBC National Press Release

Contact: Leticia McCadden
Media Relations Manager, USGBC
lmccadden@usgbc.org
202-742-3785

Groundbreaking Schools Report Shows Systemic Inequity in a State-By-State Analysis of Investment in American School Infrastructure

New Report by the U.S. Green Building Council, 21st Century School Fund and National Council on School Facilities projects a $46 billion annual deficit in U.S. school funding
 
Washington, D.C. — (March 23, 2016) — The State of Our Schools: America’s K-12 Facilities report, released today by the Center for Green Schools at the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), the 21st Century School Fund and the National Council on School Facilities, shows that the nation faces a projected annual shortfall of $46 billion in school funding, despite significant effort on the part of local communities.
 
“One out of every six people in the U.S. spends each day in a K-12 public school classroom, yet there is very little oversight over America’s public school buildings,” said Rick Fedrizzi, CEO and founding chair, USGBC. “It is totally unacceptable that there are millions of students across the country who are learning in dilapidated, obsolete and unhealthy facilities that pose obstacles to their learning and overall wellbeing. U.S. public school infrastructure is funded through a system that is inequitably affecting our nation’s students and this has to change.”
 
The report features an in-depth state-by-state analysis of investment in school infrastructure and focuses on 20 years of school facility investment nationwide, as well as funding needed moving forward to make up for annual investment shortfalls for essential repairs and upgrades. The report also proposes recommendations for investments, innovations and reforms to improve learning environments for children in all U.S. public schools.
 
“The data on funding school infrastructure paints a clear picture of the importance of a national conversation regarding the way improvements are funded. The conversation surrounding student achievement must also include a component addressing the places where our children learn,” said Mike Rowland, president, National Council on School Facilities and director of Facilities Services for the Georgia Department of Education.  
 
The report compares historic spending levels to the investment that will be needed moving forward to maintain today’s school building inventory. Estimated facilities investment requirements are based on building industry best practice standards that are adapted to public school infrastructure. This comparison reveals a projected gap of $46 billion that we as a nation must overcome to provide healthy, safe, and adequate school facilities for our children. Only three states’ average spending levels meet or exceed the standards for investment: Texas, Florida and Georgia.
 
The analysis found that the federal government provides almost no capital construction funding for school facilities, and state support for school facilities varies widely. Local school districts bear the heaviest burden in making the investments needed to build and improve school facilities. When school districts cannot afford to make these significant investments, they are often forced to make more frequent building repairs from their operating funds—the same budget that pays for teacher salaries, instructional materials and general programming.
 
Currently, six states (Massachusetts, Wyoming, Connecticut, Ohio, Kentucky and Hawaii) pay for all or nearly all of the capital construction costs for schools in their state, while 12 states (Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin) provide no direct support to districts for capital construction responsibilities. In the remaining 32 states, the levels of state support vary greatly, and the federal government contributes almost nothing to capital construction to help alleviate disparities.
 
“Even though K-12 schools are the largest public building sector in the U.S. and represent the second largest category of public infrastructure investment, there is no current dataset at a national level and many states could not report on the size of their public school inventory,” said Mary Filardo, author of the report and executive director, 21st Century School Fund.
 
The report highlights the need for better facilities information at the local, state and national levels. It has been more than 20 years since the federal government completed a comprehensive assessment of school facilities. At the time, more than half of U.S. schools had indoor air quality issues, and more than 15,000 schools were circulating air deemed unfit to breathe.
 
“The way we fund school infrastructure means that communities and states are working largely on their own to provide high-quality facilites. Without new funding models, schools in low-income areas will be unable to meet even the most basic standards for health and safety,” said Rachel Gutter, director, Center for Green Schools at USGBC. “Federal, state and local level stakeholders – from senators to state legislators to superintendents, from community leaders to impact investors – must collaborate to solve this problem.”
 
Overall the report found that communities have been doing their best to address the conditions of their schools but are in need of additional support and more equitable funding. The State of Our Schools report identifies four key strategies for addressing the structural deficits in the K–12 public education infrastructure:
  • Understand public school facilities conditions and provide communities access to accurate data about school facilities.
  • Engage in education facilities planning using best practices from across the country, and support local communities in proposing creative and practical plans to improve their public school facilities.
  • Support new public funding to provide what is needed to build and maintain adequate and equitable school facilities.
  • Leverage public and private resources to extend a community’s investments, utilizing a new generation of structures, funding streams, and partnerships.
To download the full State of Our Schools: America’s K-12 Facilities report, and to find out the conditions in your local school district, please visit: www.stateofourschools.org.
 
About the Center for Green Schools

The Center for Green Schools at the U.S. Green Building Council’s mission is to make sure every student has the opportunity to attend a green school within this generation. The Center sits at the intersection of buildings, curriculum and community and works directly with teachers, students, administrators, elected officials and communities to create programs, resources and partnerships that transform all schools into healthy learning environments. High-performing schools result in high-performing students, and green schools go far beyond bricks and mortar. The Center advances opportunities to educate a new generation of leaders, including sustainability natives, capable of driving global market transformation. To learn more please visit http://www.centerforgreenschools.org.

 

USGBCMA COP21 Unconference– Next Week!

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow


NextTuesday, March 29th, the USGBC MA chapter will be hosting a special COP21 Paris Climate Talks Unconference to revisit 2015's important climate discussions.

This is a unique opportunity to discuss the historic 2015 United Nations Congress of the Parties (COP21) in a green building context.  The provisions and commitments reached in the agreement have global implications for sustainability, climate change, and the future of our planet and certainly warrant a closer examination, extensive analysis, and more discussion.

For this reason, we have put together a half-day event featuring a community of experts from a variety of organzations and firms. Panelists who attended the Paris climate talks will be present, with break-out groups led by local issue experts.

SIGN UP NOW

Partnering Organizations: 

  • Sierra Club
  • CABA, Climate Action Business Association
  • Foundation for a Green Future
  • ELM, Envoronmental League of Massachusetts

Our Paris Panelists:

  • Michael Green, Climate Action Business Association
  • Christopher Mackey, Payette
  • Professor John Sterman, MIT System Dynamics Group

Our unConference Discussion Leaders:

  • Josh Craft, Environmental League of Massachusetts
  • Henrietta Davis, former Mayor of the City of Cambridge
  • Elizabeth Saunders, Clean Water Action


More about the Event:

More than 30 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions are buildings-related, and emissions could double
 by 2050 if we carry on business as 
usual. Inaction increases risks and vulnerability of countries, regions and local communities from climate change. Yet:

  • The buildings sector offers one of the most cost-effective and economically beneficial paths for reducing energy demand and associated emissions while at the same time supporting adaptation and resilience to climate change.
  • Many low-energy, renewable and deep- renovation solutions are available. Proven policy, finance and technology actions exist.
  • The economic, health, and social benefits of sustainable buildings are significant. Buildings provide shelter, places to live, work, learn and socialize, directly affecting our daily lives.
  • Buildings are long-term ventures. Today’s new buildings are tomorrow’s existing stock. Failure to act now will lock in growth in GHG emissions for decades.

Here is how the morning will pan out:

8:30 – 9 Registration and networking
9 – 9:15 Keynote and opening
9:15 – 10:30 Breakout (unconference)
10:30 – 10:40 Break + Networking
10:40 – 12:00 Paris Panel with questions from audience

Please join us as a community of advocates and practitioners as we explore how to leverage the public awareness and policy momentum generated by COP21 to drive policy gains in Massachusetts.

Residential Green Building Committee Recap

By Molly Cox

By Molly Cox, RGBC

The Residential Green Building Committee gathered on March 14th 2016 before the “Policy Podium: Panel Discussion on Energy with Legislators and Industry Pros” that followed. We reviewed the goals we set for 2016, such as recruiting more passionate people to Chapter, and established that the personal connection is crucial in doing this.


One of the projects we have in the works is an Integrated Energy Efficiency Program. We want to make it easier for developers and contractors to see they have access to energy efficiency incentives available to them, when pulling permits prior to construction. We need to start with one city at a time and make the change to implement these Energy Efficiency programs as mere options, not requirements.

Increasing this awareness of programs will benefit both the developers/contractors and homeowners alike. Eventually we want these programs to exist statewide, and be presented in an easily understandable way for those involved at the beginning of the construction process.

While this program will drive people to MassSave, it doesn’t stop here. There are a multitude of incentives that exist, and we just need to find the right way to make this information accessible in an easily understandable way. We should especially target Stretch Code communities, as they are most likely going to respond positively since they are already on track to utilize energy efficiency upgrades.

Stay tuned for more updates on our next Committee meeting on April 11th, and our next Policy Podium on April 14th!

Last Minute (Tomorrow): Building Tour at 450 Kendall Street!

By Ryan Duffy, Communications Fellow


Join us tomorrow, March 24th, from 5:30 to 8:30 PM for a tour of 450 Kendall, led by our sponsoring partners AHA and Arrowstreet. The facility has achieved LEED Gold, making all six of the buildings in BioMed Realty’s Kendall Square LEED certified. Kendall Square was a pioneer: this development received a special permit as a Planned Unit Developent (PUD) in 1999, before LEED certification was a requirement of special permits. There is only one parcel remaining to be developed, and that lot is currently zoned for a planned performing arts center.


Though there isn’t much land remaining in the area, the City of Cambridge is taking measures to ensure new developments are sustainably designed. The city is working on updating and amending the regulations within the Volpe Transportation Center’s existing PUD district in preparation for its highly anticipated sale and redevelopment. Located just across Third Street from BioMed’s development, the city is proposing requiring a minimum of LEED Gold standard design.


These recent efforts by the city are in line with our design for 450 Kendall; the building received +4 points out of 5 for Innovation in Design on the USGBC LEED scorecard. Some of the sustainable features of the building include faceted glass, which refracts the light of the sky and surroundings, and sunshade systems that limit solar heat gains while creating visual interest.

There will be a networking segment planned in the later half of the agenda, planned by the USGBC's Outreach Committee. 

Register here!

The event is tomorrow, March 24th, 5:30 through 8:00 PM, at Biomed Realty– 451 Kendall St., Cambridge, MA 02142.

We would like to thank Arrowstreet (and photographer Ed Wonsek) for the permission to use their photos for this posting.